
| title of the case | country | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Training in RANDSTAD |
The Netherlands |
||||||||||||||
| innovation type | job / function | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| innovative elements | |||||||||||||||
Randstad is an example of a company with a specific target group, for which training is traditionally poorly developed. However, for several reasons Randstad has developed a training policy for workers in logistics. One of the reasons are changes in institutional setting of temporary work (obligation for training in the collective agreement; less restrictions for temporary work). Experiences with training show that it is very important to win enough commitment of workers for (finishing) training. This is done by regular career interviews in which the need for training is stressed, by choosing subjects that are very much linked to day to day problems of workers (e.g. lifting techniques), by making the contents of training very practical and embedded in a nice atmosphere, by partly giving training in the worker's own time (which increases awareness of own investments) and by including penalties for not finishing a course. |
|||||||||||||||
The fact that logistics is a separate division illustrates that logistics is an important market in this area.
In the second half of the '90s Randstad became operational in the logistics market. At that time there was a great shortage of logistics workers. Therefore the logistics branch became a high priority for Randstad. Randstad mainly focuses on physical movement jobs in warehouses. Yaught Logistics will hire out highly qualified specialists. This is a daughter company of Randstad. Randstad employs two types of workers. The first group are people who do short temporary work, but are not an employee of Randstad. The second group are those who have an employee status with Randstad and are hired out to companies, often for somewhat longer periods. Randstad does not want to use the word temporary workers. It sounds better to use the name flexible worker (flex-worker).
One of the services provided which has proven to be quite successful is to send a complete team to a customer of Randstad. In times of a great shortage of workers in the logistics this type of demand of companies increased. These teams consist of a warehouse foreman with several workers. These teams can be placed anywhere. One of the advantages of these teams is that people work with the same colleagues, even if they work in various companies. Through research, Randstad has learned that a certain stability in colleagues is appreciated by the workers.
Randstad tries to match the training courses and seminars to the requirements of the job contents. As described above, the contents of the seminars is determined after consultation with employers. Issues such as working conditions (good lifting) and WMS came up from these consultation rounds. Career interviews to determine training needs are supported by job profiles used by the Randstad officers.
The first experience with the training courses was that many of the trainees did not finish the courses. Dropout rates in the courses were large. Course participants did not even show up. Therefore Randstad has introduced a payback regulation. If a training is not finished and the reason is not reproachable to Randstad, the participant has to pay back the costs. If the participant quits the job at his own initiative within a certain period after the training, he has to pay back the costs as well. This is an extra incentive to bind employees to Randstad.
Another - related - implementation problem is that many of the workers are poorly educated and do not like a "school type" of environment. Therefore the training courses are very practical and in some cases embedded in a social meeting including drinks and food.
Again another problem is that the workload for Randstad in this area varies considerably. Some years ago the prospects in this market were enormous. Therefore investments in training were high, also to bind and attract workers (who were scarce). Now, the market has gone down. This means that Randstad contracts fewer workers as own employees, but works more with temporary workers. Because lower prospects, less labour scarcity and shorter periods of temporary work, the incentive to invest in training for Randstad is less. However, because this is believed to be temporary, in the long run, this market is expected to grow and labour shortages will reappear. Training will then return even stronger as a crucial instrument to profile Randstad to employers as well as potential workers.
Randstad has on average 200-300 participants for the training courses per year (excluding the evening seminars). The total of temporary workers is on an average approximately 1,200 per year. However, training investments vary over the years. In the first years, Randstad Logistics spent around 250 thousand euros per year on training. This is much lower now in a market that is "down". Structurally, the budgets for training are higher than what is actually spent, which illustrates that the workers do not use the possibilities, because a training culture is not present among many of them.
Research showed that training increases the feeling of job security, which makes working for Randstad more attractive. So it also increases the chance that workers will stay longer.
The results from the payback rules that were introduced were very good. For example in the course for forklift-truck driving, the success rate increased from less than 50% to about 85%.
In many countries work in logistics is partly carried out by labour from temporary labour offices. This is because workload fluctuates strongly within companies and the work cannot be delayed. For temporary labour offices it is not so attractive to invest in training, because workers often stay for a short period and therefore the office only partly reaps the benefits from these investments. However, in the Netherlands, training policy in Randstad in this area has developed, because legislation makes it possible for Randstad to employ workers for a longer time. Moreover, training investments are now obligatory in the collective agreement. Finally, Randstad felt the need to invest in order to make it easier to attract workers in the years of labour scarcity.
The experiences with training underline the need for practical oriented training for these target groups. Moreover, commitment to finish a course has also to come from pay back rules if one does not show up or drops out. Moreover, by partly being trained in "own time", a participant is more aware that he is investing in himself as well.
The cases show that a different institutional environment (training commitments in collective agreements and less restriction in temporary work) helps to start tot develop a training policy. Moreover, the case shows the problems that emerge when developing training activities and how to tackle these problems. This can be helpful for actors in temporary work in other countries.